Articulation of response

tyle=”text-align: justify;”>Articulation of response

Unsatisfactory/Not Present Does Not Meet Standard Minimally Competent Competent Highly Competent
The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response. The candidate provides limited articulation of response. The candidate provides adequate articulation of response. The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the topic under investigation, including how it is important to nursing. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of the topic under investigation, including how it is important to nursing. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of the topic under investigation, including how it is important to nursing.

The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of the topic under investigation, including how it is important to nursing. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of the topic under investigation, including how it is important to nursing.
The candidate does not provide an appropriate problem statement, including the reason for performing a literature review on the chosen topic. Not applicable. The candidate provides an appropriate problem statement, with insufficient detail, including the reason for performing a literature review on the chosen topic. Not applicable. The candidate provides an appropriate problem statement, with sufficient detail, including the reason for performing a literature review on the chosen topic.

The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of 5 resources or databases that may be considered for primary research, including a review of the value and credibility to the chosen topic. The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with no detail, of 5 resources or databases that may be considered for primary research, including a review of the value and credibility to the chosen topic. The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with limited detail, of 5 resources or databases that may be considered for primary research, including a review of the value and credibility to the chosen topic. The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with adequate detail, of 5 resources or databases that may be considered for primary research, including a review of the value and credibility to the chosen topic. The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with substantial detail, of 5 resources or databases that may be considered for primary research, including a review of the value and credibility to the chosen topic.

The candidate does not provide an “Evidence-Based Practice Matrix” for the primary credible research sources. The candidate provides a completed “Evidence-Based Practice Matrix” for 1-4 primary credible research sources. The candidate provides a completed “Evidence-Based Practice Matrix” for 5-9 primary credible research sources. Not applicable. The candidate provides a completed “Evidence-Based Practice Matrix” for the 10 primary credible research sources.
The candidate does not provide an appropriate annotated bibliography of eachpiece of research included in the matrix. Not applicable. The candidate provides an appropriate annotated bibliography, with insufficient detail, of each piece of research included in the matrix. Not applicable. The candidate provides an appropriate annotated bibliography, with sufficient detail, of each piece of research included in the matrix.

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the results of the original search strategy, including the resources, databases, and keywords used. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the results of the original search strategy, including the resources, databases, and keywords used. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the results of the original search strategy, including the resources, databases, and keywords used. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the results of the original search strategy, including the resources, databases, and keywords used. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the results of the original search strategy, including the resources, databases, and keywords used.